Indian conglomerate Future Retail Limited (FRL) has said that the Emergency Arbitrator (EA) order passed by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) on Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) deal is ‘not enforceable’ and ‘not binding’ on it.

Earlier last month, e-commerce giant Amazon reportedly launched legal proceedings against Indian retailer Future Group for allegedly breaching the terms of a non-compete contract.

Go deeper with GlobalData

Data Insights

The gold standard of business intelligence.

Find out more

Related Company Profiles

View all

RIL’s subsidiary Reliance Retail Ventures Limited (RRVL) agreed to buy certain businesses of Future Group for ₹247.13bn ($3.38bn) in August.

Against this background, SIAC issued an interim order last week to hold off FRL’s deal with RIL.

In a stock exchange filing, FRL also said the EA is “void and coram non-judice” and vows to resist on any move to enforce the order.

The company said in a statement: “The EA Order is not enforceable under the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and is not binding on FRL.

How well do you really know your competitors?

Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.

Company Profile – free sample

Thank you!

Your download email will arrive shortly

Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample

We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form

By GlobalData
Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

“Any attempt on the part of Amazon to enforce the EA Order shall be resisted by FRL to the fullest extent available under Indian law.

“FRL is also in the process of taking appropriate legal action to protect its rights.

“This contention raised by Amazon is entirely misconceived. In fact, if the two separate agreements were treated as a single integrated transaction by which Amazon obtained an interest in and rights against FRL, then in 2019.”